Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

<jats:sec id="S0033291711001954_sec_a001"><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Meta-analyses show that cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis (CBT-P) improves distressing positive symptoms. However, it is a complex intervention involving a range of techniques. No previous study has assessed the delivery of the different elements of treatment and their effect on outcome. Our aim was to assess the differential effect of type of treatment delivered on the effectiveness of CBT-P, using novel statistical methodology.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S0033291711001954_sec_a002"><jats:title>Method</jats:title><jats:p>The Psychological Prevention of Relapse in Psychosis (PRP) trial was a multi-centre randomized controlled trial (RCT) that compared CBT-P with treatment as usual (TAU). Therapy was manualized, and detailed evaluations of therapy delivery and client engagement were made. Follow-up assessments were made at 12 and 24 months. In a planned analysis, we applied principal stratification (involving structural equation modelling with finite mixtures) to estimate intention-to-treat (ITT) effects for subgroups of participants, defined by qualitative and quantitative differences in receipt of therapy, while maintaining the constraints of randomization.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S0033291711001954_sec_a003" sec-type="results"><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Consistent delivery of full therapy, including specific cognitive and behavioural techniques, was associated with clinically and statistically significant increases in months in remission, and decreases in psychotic and affective symptoms. Delivery of partial therapy involving engagement and assessment was not effective.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S0033291711001954_sec_a004" sec-type="conclusion"><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Our analyses suggest that CBT-P is of significant benefit on multiple outcomes to patients able to engage in the full range of therapy procedures. The novel statistical methods illustrated in this report have general application to the evaluation of heterogeneity in the effects of treatment.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Original publication

DOI

10.1017/s0033291711001954

Type

Journal article

Journal

Psychological Medicine

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Publication Date

05/2012

Volume

42

Pages

1057 - 1068