Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

OBJECTIVE: To compare invasive blood pressure measurements recorded using an automated archiving method against clinician-documented values from the same invasive monitor and determine which method of recording blood pressure is more highly associated with the subsequent onset of hypotension. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative analysis. SETTING: Intensive care patients in a university hospital. PATIENTS: Mixed medical/surgical patients. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Using intervals of hemodynamic stability from 2,320 patient records, we retrospectively compared paired sources of invasive blood pressure data: 1) measurements documented by the nursing staff and 2) measurements generated by an automated archiving method that intelligently excludes unreliable (e.g., noisy or excessively damped) blood pressure values. The primary outcome was the occurrence of subsequent "consensus" hypotension, i.e., hypotension documented jointly by the nursing staff and the automated archive. The automated method could be adjusted to alter its operating characteristics (sensitivity and specificity). At a matched level of specificity (96%), blood pressures from the automated archiving method were more sensitive (28%) for subsequent consensus hypotension vs. the nurse-documented values (21%). Likewise, at a matched level of sensitivity (21%), the values from the automated method were more specific (99%) vs. the nurse-documented values (96%). These significant findings (p < .001) were consistent in a set of sensitivity analyses that employed alternative criteria for patient selection and the clinical outcome definition. CONCLUSIONS: During periods of hemodynamic stability in an intensive care unit patient population, clinician-documented blood pressure values were inferior to values from an intelligent automated archiving method as early indicators of hemodynamic instability. Human oversight may not be necessary for creating a valid archive of vital sign data within an electronic medical record. Furthermore, if clinicians do have a tendency to disregard early indications of instability, then an automated archive may be a preferable source of data for so-called early warning systems that identify patients at risk of decompensation.

Original publication

DOI

10.1097/CCM.0b013e31820eab8e

Type

Journal article

Journal

Crit Care Med

Publication Date

05/2011

Volume

39

Pages

1006 - 1014

Keywords

Blood Pressure Determination, Blood Pressure Monitors, Cohort Studies, Critical Care, Critical Illness, Documentation, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Hypotension, Intensive Care Units, Male, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Monitoring, Physiologic, Physician-Patient Relations, Point-of-Care Systems, Reproducibility of Results, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity