Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

SummaryThe role of the revised cardiac risk index in risk stratification has recently been challenged by studies reporting on the superior predictive ability of pre‐operative B‐type natriuretic peptides. We found that in 850 vascular surgical patients initially risk stratified using B‐type natriuretic peptides, reclassification with the number of revised cardiac risk index risk factors worsened risk stratification (p < 0.05 for > 0, > 2, > 3 and > 4 risk factors, and p = 0.23 for > 1 risk factor). When evaluated with pre‐operative B‐type natriuretic peptides, none of the revised cardiac risk index risk factors were independent predictors of major adverse cardiac events in vascular patients. The only independent predictor was B‐type natriuretic peptide stratification (OR 5.1, 95% CI 1.8–15 for the intermediate class, and OR 25, 95% CI 8.7–70 for the high‐risk class). The clinical risk factors in the revised cardiac risk index cannot improve a risk stratification model based on B‐type natriuretic peptides.

Original publication

DOI

10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06958.x

Type

Journal article

Journal

Anaesthesia

Publisher

Wiley

Publication Date

01/2012

Volume

67

Pages

55 - 59