Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

OBJECTIVE: To test if deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatment of dystonia was similar in patients before and after implantation of rechargeable internal pulse generators (IPGs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) severity and disability scores were compared in patients before DBS insertion, 24 months after DBS insertion with a nonrechargeable IPG, and after implantation of a rechargeable IPG. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between dystonia control in patients before and after implantation of a rechargeable IPG. CONCLUSIONS: Rechargeable IPGs should be the IPGs of choice for dystonic patients receiving DBS as IPGs offer similar treatment efficacy to nonrechargeable IPGs with advantages in terms of costs and reductions in reimplantation frequency.

Original publication

DOI

10.1111/ner.12026

Type

Journal

Neuromodulation

Publication Date

05/2013

Volume

16

Pages

226 - 229

Keywords

Deep Brain Stimulation, Disability Evaluation, Dystonia, Electric Power Supplies, Electrodes, Implanted, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Globus Pallidus, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index