Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BACKGROUND: Myalgia, defined as any pain perceived in muscle, is very common in the general population and a frequent cause for referral to neurologists, rheumatologists and internists in general. It is however only rarely due to primary muscle disease and often referred from ligaments, joints, bones, the peripheral and central nervous system. A muscle biopsy should only be performed if this is likely to be diagnostically useful. At present no 'guidelines' exist. METHODS: An EFNS panel of muscle specialists was set to review relevant studies from PubMed dating as far back as 1/1/1990. Only Class IV studies were available and therefore the recommendations arrived at are 'best practice recommendations' based on information harvested from the literature search and expert opinion. RESULTS: Muscle cramps should be recognized while drugs, infections, metabolic/ endocrinological and rheumatological causes of myalgia should be identified from the history and examination and pertinent laboratory tests. A muscle biopsy is more likely to be diagnostically useful if myalgia is exertional and if one or more of the following apply: i) there is myoglobinuria, (ii) there is a second wind phenomenon, (iii) there is muscle weakness, (iv) there is muscle hypertrophy /atrophy, (v) there is hyperCKemia (>2-3× normal), and (vi) there is a myopathic EMG. CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with myalgia can be recommended to have a biopsy based on careful history and examination and on simple laboratory screening.

Original publication

DOI

10.1111/ene.12174

Type

Journal article

Journal

Eur J Neurol

Publication Date

07/2013

Volume

20

Pages

997 - 1005

Keywords

Biopsy, Exercise, Humans, Myalgia, Predictive Value of Tests