The response of spinal cord ependymomas to bevacizumab in patients with neurofibromatosis Type 2
Morris KA., Afridi SK., Evans DG., Hensiek AE., McCabe MG., Kellett M., Halliday D., Pretorius PM., Parry A.
<jats:sec> <jats:title>OBJECTIVE</jats:title> <jats:p>People with neurofibromatosis Type 2 (NF2) have a genetic predisposition to nervous system tumors. NF2-associated schwannomas stabilize or decrease in size in over half of the patients while they are receiving bevacizumab. NF2 patients treated with bevacizumab for rapidly growing schwannoma were retrospectively reviewed with regard to ependymoma prevalence and response to treatment.</jats:p></jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>METHODS</jats:title> <jats:p>The records of 95 NF2 patients receiving bevacizumab were retrospectively reviewed with regard to spinal ependymoma prevalence and behavior. The maximum longitudinal extent (MLE) of the ependymoma and associated intratumoral or juxtatumoral cysts were measured on serial images. Neurological changes and patient function were reviewed and correlated with radiological changes.</jats:p></jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>RESULTS</jats:title> <jats:p>Forty-one of 95 patients were found to have ependymomas (median age 26 years; range 11–53 years). Thirty-two patients with a total of 71 ependymomas had scans appropriate for serial assessment with a mean follow-up of 24 months (range 3–57 months). Ependymomas without cystic components showed minimal change in MLE. Twelve patients had ependymomas with cystic components or syringes. In these patients, reductions in MLE were observed, particularly due to decreases in the cystic components of the ependymoma. Clinical improvement was seen in 7 patients, who all had cystic ependymomas.</jats:p></jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>CONCLUSIONS</jats:title> <jats:p>Bevacizumab treatment in NF2 patients with spinal cord ependymomas results in a decrease in the size of intratumoral and juxtatumoral cysts as well as adjacent-cord syringes and a decrease in cord edema. This may provide clinical benefit in some patients, although the changes do not meet the current criteria for radiological tumor response.</jats:p></jats:sec>