ABSTRACT Objective To (1) validate GAD65‐ELISA detection and quantification for type 1 diabetes mellitus and autoimmune neurological diagnoses, (2) correlate ELISA results (reference range < 5 IU/mL) with established radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIA; ≤ 0.02 nmol/L), and (3) define ELISA clinical utility and pitfalls. Methods Serum performance for diabetes (FDA‐cleared, undiluted) was verified, and neurological laboratory‐developed serum and CSF dilution protocols were validated to extend the reportable range beyond > 250 IU/mL. ELISA and RIA values were correlated, including established neurological RIA cut‐offs (serum ≥ 20 nmol/L; CSF any positive). Results ELISA met analytical criteria (precision, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, reference range) in serum and CSF and was clinically equivalent to RIA for autoimmune diabetes. Neurological ELISA cut‐offs were established at 10,000 IU/mL (serum) and 100 IU/mL (CSF). Precision was better below 10,000 IU/mL (CVs < 20%) than above (CVs 30.8% serum; 26.5% CSF). ELISA–RIA correlation and agreement was stronger below the neurological cut‐off (R 2  = 0.89) than above (R 2  = 0.36). Positive agreement for RIA‐defined neurological disease was 100% in serum and CSF; all serums were > 10,000 IU/mL. Clinical specificity was 97.5% in serum and 100% in CSF, exceeding reported RIA specificity. Screen results > 250 IU/mL spanned a wide range of dilution values; many were below the neurological cut‐off. Most patients with paired serum/CSF positivity showed elevated GAD65 IgG indices. Interpretation GAD65 ELISA and RIA have equivalent sensitivity for autoimmune diabetes and neurological testing, with higher specificity for ELISA. A serum cut‐off of 10,000 IU/mL is informative but requires clinical context, and dilution of screen > 250 IU/mL samples is essential for neurological interpretation.