Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

PURPOSE: To optimize Relaxation along a Fictitious Field (RAFF) pulses for rotating frame relaxometry with improved robustness in the presence of B 0 $$ {\mathrm{B}}_0 $$ and B 1 + $$ {\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$ field inhomogeneities. METHODS: The resilience of RAFF pulses against B 0 $$ {\mathrm{B}}_0 $$ and B 1 + $$ {\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$ inhomogeneities was studied using Bloch simulations. A parameterized extension of the RAFF formulation was introduced and used to derive a generalized inhomogeneity-resilient RAFF (girRAFF) pulse. RAFF and girRAFF preparation efficiency, defined as the ratio of the longitudinal magnetization before and after the preparation ( M z ( T p ) / M 0 $$ {M}_z\left({T}_p\right)/{M}_0 $$ ), were simulated and validated in phantom experiments. T RAFF $$ {T}_{\mathrm{RAFF}} $$ and T girRAFF $$ {T}_{\mathrm{girRAFF}} $$ parametric maps were acquired at 3T in phantom, the calf muscle, and the knee cartilage of healthy subjects. The relaxation time maps were analyzed for resilience against artificially induced field inhomogeneities and assessed in terms of in vivo reproducibility. RESULTS: Optimized girRAFF preparations yielded improved preparation efficiency (0.95/0.91 simulations/phantom) with respect to RAFF (0.36/0.67 simulations/phantom). T girRAFF $$ {T}_{\mathrm{girRAFF}} $$ preparations showed in phantom/calf 6.0/4.8 times higher resilience to B 0 $$ {\mathrm{B}}_0 $$ inhomogeneities than RAFF, and a 4.7/5.3 improved resilience to B 1 + $$ {\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$ inhomogeneities. In the knee cartilage, T girRAFF $$ {T}_{\mathrm{girRAFF}} $$ (53 ± $$ \pm $$ 14 ms) was higher than T RAFF $$ {T}_{\mathrm{RAFF}} $$ (42 ± $$ \pm $$ 11 ms). Moreover, girRAFF preparations yielded 7.6/4.9 times improved reproducibility across B 0 $$ {\mathrm{B}}_0 $$ / B 1 + $$ {\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$ inhomogeneity conditions, 1.9 times better reproducibility across subjects and 1.2 times across slices compared with RAFF. Dixon-based fat suppression led to a further 15-fold improvement in the robustness of girRAFF to inhomogeneities. CONCLUSIONS: RAFF pulses display residual sensitivity to off-resonance and pronounced sensitivity to B 1 + $$ {\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$ inhomogeneities. Optimized girRAFF pulses provide increased robustness and may be an appealing alternative for applications where resilience against field inhomogeneities is required.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1002/mrm.30219

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2024-12-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

92

Pages

2373 - 2391

Total pages

18

Keywords

B 0 $$ {\mathrm{B}}_0 $$ / B 1 + $$ {\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$ inhomogeneities, RAFF, RF pulse design, relaxation mapping, rotating‐frame of reference, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Phantoms, Imaging, Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Muscle, Skeletal, Adult, Reproducibility of Results, Male