Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

AbstractSingle‐shot echo‐planar imaging has been used widely in diffusion magnetic resonance imaging due to the difficulties in correcting motion‐induced phase corruption in multishot data. Readout‐segmented EPI has addressed the multishot problem by introducing a two‐dimensional nonlinear navigator correction with online reacquisition of uncorrectable data to enable acquisition of high‐resolution diffusion data with reduced susceptibility artifact and T*2 blurring. The primary shortcoming of readout‐segmented EPI in its current form is its long acquisition time (longer than similar resolution single‐shot echo‐planar imaging protocols by approximately the number of readout segments), which limits the number of diffusion directions. By omitting readout segments at one side of k‐space and using partial Fourier reconstruction, readout‐segmented EPI imaging times could be reduced. In this study, the effects of homodyne and projection onto convex sets reconstructions on estimates of the fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and diffusion orientation in fiber tracts and raw T2‐ and trace‐weighted signal are compared, along with signal‐to‐noise ratio results. It is found that projections onto convex sets reconstruction with 3/5 segments in a 2 mm isotropic diffusion tensor image acquisition and 9/13 segments in a 0.9 × 0.9 × 4.0 mm3 diffusion‐weighted image acquisition provide good fidelity relative to the full k‐space parameters. This allows application of readout‐segmented EPI to tractography studies, and clinical stroke and oncology protocols. Magn Reson Med, 2012. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1002/mrm.23242

Type

Journal article

Publisher

Wiley

Publication Date

2012-08-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

68

Pages

441 - 451

Total pages

10