Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

PurposeCerebral blood flow (CBF) is an informative physiological marker for tissue health. Arterial spin labeling (ASL) is a noninvasive MRI method of measuring this parameter, but it has proven difficult to measure white matter (WM) CBF due to low intrinsic contrast‐to‐noise ratio compared with gray matter (GM). Here we combine ultra‐high field and optimal sampling strategy (OSS) ASL to investigate WM CBF in reasonable scan times.MethodsA FAIR‐based ASL sequence at 7T was combined with a real‐time‐feedback OSS technique, to iteratively improve post‐label image acquisition times (TIs) on a tissue‐ and subject‐specific basis to obtain WM CBF quantification.ResultsIt was found 77% of WM voxels gave a reasonable CBF fit. Averaged WM CBF for these voxels was found to be 16.3 ± 1.5 mL/100 g/min (discarding partial‐volumed voxels). The generated TI schedule was also significantly different when altering the OSS weighted‐tissue‐mask, favoring longer TIs in WM.ConclusionWM CBF could be reasonably quantified in over 75% of identified voxels, from a total preparation and scan time of 15 min. OSS results suggest longer TIs should be used versus general GM ASL settings; this may become more important in WM disease studies. Magn Reson Med 73:2243–2248, 2015. © 2014 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1002/mrm.25333

Type

Journal article

Publisher

Wiley

Publication Date

2015-06-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

73

Pages

2243 - 2248

Total pages

5