Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

<jats:p> Beat-to-beat variability in blood pressure (BP) is associated with recurrent stroke despite good control of hypertension. However, no study has identified rates of progression of beat-to-beat BP variability (BPV), its determinants, or which patient groups are particularly affected, limiting understanding of its potential as a treatment target. In consecutive patients one month after a transient ischaemic attack or nondisabling stroke (Oxford Vascular Study), continuous noninvasive BP was measured beat-to-beat over 5 minutes (Finometer). Arterial stiffness was measured by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (Sphygmocor). Repeat assessments were performed at the 5-year follow-up visit and agreement determined by intraclass correlation coefficient. Rates of progression of systolic BPV (SBPV) and diastolic BPV (DBPV) and their determinants were estimated by mixed-effect linear models, adjusted for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors. One hundred eighty-eight of 310 surviving, eligible patients had repeat assessments after a median of 5.8 years. Pulse wave velocity was highly reproducible but SBPV and DBPV were not (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.71, 0.10, and 0.16, respectively), however, all 3 progressed significantly (pulse wave velocity, 2.39%, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt;0.0001; SBPV, 8.36%, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt;0.0001; DBPV, 9.7, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt;0.0001). Rate of progression of pulse wave velocity, SBPV, and DBPV all increased significantly with age ( <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt;0.0001), with an increasingly positive skew and were particularly associated with female sex (pulse wave velocity <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> =0.00035; SBPV <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt;0.0001; DBPV <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt;0.0001) and aortic mean SBP (SBPV <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> =0.037, DBPV <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt;0.0001). Beat-to-beat BP variability progresses significantly in high-risk patients, particularly in older individuals with elevated aortic systolic pressure. Beat-to-beat BPV and its progression represent potential new therapeutic targets to reduce cardiovascular risk. </jats:p>

Original publication




Journal article




Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Publication Date