Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

<jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) is an important cause of stroke worldwide. Separate reports in Caucasians and Asians with stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) have suggested lower ICAS prevalence in Caucasians, but there has been no direct comparisons of the two ethnic groups with the same criteria to define ICAS.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Acute minor stroke or TIA patients in two cohorts respectively recruiting patients in Oxford (2011–2018, predominantly Caucasians) and Hong Kong (2011–2015, predominantly Chinese) were compared. ICAS was defined as ≥50% stenosis/occlusion in any major intracranial artery in MR/CT angiography. Prevalence, distribution and risk factors of ICAS were compared between the two cohorts. We also systematically reviewed literature on ICAS prevalence in stroke/TIA patients in different populations.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Among 1287 patients from Oxford and 691 from Hong Kong (mean age 69 vs 66), ICAS prevalence was higher in Chinese than in Caucasians (43.0% vs 20.0%; OR 3.02; 95% CI 2.47 to 3.70; p&lt;0.001), independent of age (age-adjusted OR 3.73; 95% CI 3.00 to 4.63; p&lt;0.001) and vascular risk factors (multivariable-adjusted OR 3.21; 95% CI 2.56 to 4.02; p&lt;0.001). This ethnic difference was greater (p interaction=0.005) at age &lt;70 years (OR 5.33; 95% CI 3.79 to 7.50; p&lt;0.001) than at ≥70 years (OR 2.81; 95% CI 2.11 to 3.74; p&lt;0.001). ICAS prevalence increased with age and with vascular risk factors in both cohorts, with equivalent prevalence in Chinese aged &lt;60 years and Caucasians aged ≥80, and in Chinese with no vascular risk factor and Caucasians with two vascular risk factors. ICAS locations also differed between Chinese and Caucasian patients.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Chinese are more susceptible to ICAS than Caucasians, with an earlier onset age and a higher prevalence, independent of vascular risk factors.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Original publication

DOI

10.1136/jnnp-2020-325630

Type

Journal article

Journal

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Publisher

BMJ

Publication Date

30/03/2021