Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Remember trying to spot the subtle differences between pictures as a child? It kept us quiet for hours! Neuroscientists including Chrystalina Antoniades have been working with staff at Oxford’s Ashmolean Museum on some interesting ‘spot the difference’ experiments, to try and find out more about how we perceive things.

In particular, they’ve been looking at whether our perception operates differently when we are looking at a screen, from when we are looking at actual objects in our environment. You might think that it’s easier to spot differences in the real world than it is on screen, and there is some evidence that binocular vision (using both eyes to look at real 3D objects) is better than monocular vision (which is what we use when we look at representations on a 2D screen).

It turns out that in this experiment, the phenomenon of ‘change blindness’ - essentially when we can’t spot the difference - occurs both when looking at images on screen and at objects in the real world. Change blindness occurs when a small change in what we are looking at (e.g. in a film of a Chinese porcelain bowl) is obscured by us blinking, or the screen flickering, for example. This sort of inability to ‘spot the difference’ is interesting, because it’s not about lack of attention, given that the people in the experiment were actively engaged in looking at the objects very carefully.

Indeed, this was why the researchers chose to carry out this experiment in a museum, since it could be argued that in this sort of setting, people are more than usually focused on the things they are looking at. The team chose pairs of artefacts including Japanese woodblock prints, Iranian tiles and bronze medals, all of which had been designed to appear identical, but due to the passage of time now exhibited several small differences for example in colour. They set up the real-world and on-screen viewing situations with very exact conditions and specific instructions for the participants regarding how they were to observe the objects.

As well as finding that change blindness did occur in a museum setting, and that there were no statistically significant differences between the degree of change blindness when looking at actual objects or objects on screen, the study also revealed that certain objects were more likely to lead to the experience of change blindness. The researchers found that these objects had a greater variation in colour, or larger areas of each object were different.

While there are obvious limitations to this experiment, and the interpretation of all its findings is not straightforward, it adds to the body of knowledge about how we perceive the (increasingly virtual) world around us. The scientists hope to continue to work with the Museum staff to build on this work in the future.

Read the journal article

Similar stories

Magnetic signatures of the brain characterised in UK Biobank imaging study

A study published this week in Nature Neuroscience demonstrates how studying the magnetic properties of tissue may provide a unique window into brain health and disease.

NICE recommends offering app-based treatment for people with insomnia instead of sleeping pills

Hundreds of thousands of people suffering from insomnia who would usually be prescribed sleeping pills could be offered an app-based treatment programme instead, NICE has said.

Developmental dynamics of the neural crest–mesenchymal axis in creating the thymic microenvironment

A new paper from researchers at the Department of Paediatrics and the Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences has shown that fibroblasts in the thymus, often considered simply as dull “structural” cells, are much more complex than previously thought.

How to use the science of the body clock to improve our sleep and health

Professor Russell Foster has written a new book about circadian neuroscience which is published by Penguin this week. This book review by Jacqueline Pumphrey was first published on the University of Oxford website.

Funding awarded for autoimmune disease research

Dr Kate Attfield awarded project funding by Connect Immune Research and The Lorna and Yuti Chernajovsky Biomedical Research Foundation.