Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The REcovery FoLlowing Intensive CarE Treatment (REFLECT) research programme was funded by a grant awarded by the NIHR Research for Patient Benefit scheme. The first phase of this work is now complete and the results are being used to inform development of a complex intervention to improve post-ICU ward care.


A substantial number of patients discharged from Intensive Care Units (ICUs) subsequently die without leaving hospital. It is unclear how many of these deaths are preventable. Ward-based management following discharge from ICU is an area that patients and healthcare staff are concerned about. The primary aim of REFLECT (Recovery Following Intensive Care Treatment) was to develop an intervention plan to reduce in-hospital mortality rates in patients who have been discharged from ICU.

REFLECT was a multicentre mixed methods exploratory study examining ward care delivery to adult patients discharged from ICU. The study was made up of four sub-studies. Medical notes of 300 patients who were discharged from intensive care and subsequently died were examined using a Retrospective Case Records Review (RCRR) technique. Interviews were also conducted with 55 participants. Patients and their relatives were interviewed about their post-ICU care, including relatives of patients who died in hospital following ICU discharge. Staff involved in the care of patients post-ICU discharge were interviewed about the care of this patient group. The medical records of 40 patients who either survived their post-ICU stay or did not survive and had problems in their care were also reviewed using the RCRR and in-depth analysis. The evidence generated in these four sub-studies will form the basis of the intervention development, which will take place through stakeholder and clinical expert meetings.   

Project Publications

The first paper from the REFLECT team reported a meta-analysis of out-of-hours discharge from intensive care, which formed part of the background work to the project. Published in Intensive Care Medicine.

The protocol has been published in BMJ Open.

The REFLECT study was presented at European Society of Intensive Care Medicine 2018 and Intensive Care Society State of the Art 2018.

Using a structured judgement review methodology to evaluate care following discharge from ICU

Out-of-hours discharge from intensive care is associated with increased mortality. What next?

REFLECT was also shortlisted for the Intensive Care Society gold medal award and presented at ICS State of the Art 2019.

Lay summary

Most patients discharged from an intensive care unit (ICU) are expected to go home. However, about 1 in 12 die unexpectedly on general wards before leaving hospital. The high death rate occurs despite hospitals using ‘early warning’ scoring systems and visits from ICU teams. A plan which reduces this death rate is urgently needed. We will use several approaches to make sure that we get a clear picture of how to improve care. We will:
· Talk to patients, relatives, and staff with experience of ward care after ICU
· Look at the notes of patients cared for in wards after discharge from ICU.
· Look at published research to find known ways of improving care in this patient group.

Patient representatives will help us use this information to design a plan to deliver better care to patients who have been in ICU, whilst they remain in hospital. Experts in introducing change will help design the best intervention. This project will combine information from several sources with experts skilled at making plans work. This will allow us to make the best possible plan.

After this project, we want to test whether our plan could be put in place in our local hospitals to see if we could undertake a large trial. Over 2300 lives would be saved in the UK each year if our plan worked and stopped only a quarter of the unexpected deaths in patients discharged from ICU.

Project updates

March 2019: Study completed. 

December 2018: Interviews completed.

December 2018: Intensive Care Society State of the Art conference. Poster presentation.

October 2018: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Poster presentation.

September 2018: Stakeholder meetings for intervention development using Functional Resonance Analysis Method.

September 2018: Case record reviews completed.

February 2018: Structured case record reviews commenced.

September 2017: Patient and staff interviews commenced across three sites.

June 2017: HRA Confidentiality Advisory Group Approval (ref: 17\CAG\0063) and full HRA Approval confirmed

May 2017: REC Approval confirmed (ref: 17\WA\0139)

March 2017: Ethics application submitted

October 2016: Formal start date approved following completion of contract negotiations

November 2015: Grant awarded (ref: PB-PG-01215-36149)

May 2015: Grant application submitted to National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB)

Contact details for the REFLECT study

The REFLECT study is managed and co-ordinated by Sarah Vollam and Owen Gustafson.